skip to site navigation

PostTreatySettlements.org.nz

LOGIN
  • HOME
  • ABOUT THE PROJECT
  • WEBLOG
  • CONTACT US

Sitemap of PostTreatySettlements.org.nz

  • 50 Years Time
  • The impact of changing Maori demographics on Treaty settlement governance structures
  • The post-Treaty settlement relationship between Maori and Chinese New Zealanders
  • A New Zeal and Optimism
  • We, the Peoples: Debating constitutional change in New Zealand’s diverse population
  • Imagining a Post-Settlement Future: In this together?
  • An Iwi Security Council, the demise of the Maori Trustee and other bold predictions
  • Indigenous Rights
  • Free and equal to all other peoples
  • Storm in a teacup
  • Long standing implications: The UNDRIP and NZ
  • NZ, UNDRIP, and the Pacific: Counter-intuitive Speculations
  • Maori Representation
  • Maori representation: fairer, guaranteed and independent
  • Guaranteed national and local Maori representation
  • Why does it matter? Group representation and the role of the Maori seats
  • Constructing a House Fit for the Future
  • Full and Final
  • The Paradox of Settlement
  • The full and final fantasy
  • Achieving enduring settlements
  • Telling the truth in our streets
  • Now that we have settled, what is in it for me?
  • Crown Maori Co Management
  • Power-sharing and Natural Resources
  • Those that trespass will be relish for my food
  • Valuing tikanga – sharing power through co-management
  • About the project
  • Authors
  • PTS Project Weblog
  • Rules
  • Contact
  • Issue 1: What will be the importance of the Treaty in 50 years' time?
  • Issue 2: Will the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples have any impact?
  • Issue 3: What should be the future of the Māori seats?
  • Issue 4: Are Treaty settlements 'full and final'?
  • Issue 5: How will the Crown-Māori co-management of natural resources work out?

Recent Comments

  • leanne cotter: Trustees need to be completely transparent in how they invest and apportion capital. At the moment it seems there is very little trickle down effect... Feb 23, 9:02 PM
  • Jarrod: Kia ora, The Urewera District Native Reserve Act 1896 was introduced during a period of Mâori survival. Would Co-management surivive too? Perhaps John Key should... Nov 17, 7:30 PM
  • Wendy McGuiness: Thank you for your insightful question. As you may have found in your studies and as I note in this paper, New Zealand’s constitution is... Oct 07, 3:48 PM
  • Mary Ropiha: Hi I'm just inquiring. I am a first year tertiary student for Te Wananga O Raukawa O Pukekohe MBS. And I am currently studying the... Sep 24, 4:47 PM
  • Peter James: Linda begins her thoughtful piece with the comment that ‘environmental co-management works well: through empowering the community you get better environmental outcomes. The Ōrākei and... Sep 13, 10:49 AM

Background Paper

A changing population, changing identities: The Crown-Māori relationship in 50 years' time? [600 KB PDF]

Who is 'Māori', and who or what is 'the Crown'?

Who we are, and how we understand ourselves and name our identities, is always changing. As we project what New Zealand's population might look like in 50 years’ time, we need to consider not only technical influences on population composition, such as fertility and mortality rates and migration, but also changes in how we might view ourselves.

Project partners: The School of Maori Studies and the Institute of Policy Studies The School of Maori Studies Institute of Policy Studies

Powered by WordPress | Theme by motuweb | Design by Alltex | Sitemap